Are Children Learning

Test scores jumped in innovation schools, but IPS leaders aren’t declaring victory just yet.

PHOTO: Dylan Peers McCoy
Phalen Leadership Academy at IPS School 103 is one of several innovation schools that had big jumps in test scores.

Nearly every innovation school in Indianapolis saw a jump in its passing rates on state achievement tests — some by 8 percentage points or more — giving advocates hope that their management approach is working.

Of the eight innovation schools that took the ISTEP test last spring, seven had higher passing rates on both the math and English tests than in the previous year. Five had among the largest gains in the district. In contrast, the number of grade 3-8 students districtwide who passed both tests slipped 1 percentage point.

Indianapolis Public School leaders have embraced innovation schools over the past three years as a way to turn around long-struggling schools and give extra freedoms to successful schools. But this is one of the earliest signs that the strategy may help improve test scores.

“It’s the first quantifiable validation that the direction of IPS, especially in terms of innovation network schools, is really off to a promising start,” said Brandon Brown of the Mind Trust, which has been influential in pushing for innovation schools in the district.

Innovation schools are run by nonprofits or charter operators, but they are ultimately overseen by the district, which gets credit for their test scores on its state evaluation. The approach has been a source of persistent controversy, in part because teachers work for the school manager rather than the district, and are not part of the district union.

Officials have expanded the network of innovation schools over the last three years, and 16 innovation schools now enroll about 6,307 students, nearly 20 percent of the students in the district. But district leaders reacted cautiously to the improvement in test results, describing the innovation schools approach as simply one of its many turnaround strategies.

“It’s super promising,” said school board President Mary Ann Sullivan. “But it’s certainly way, way, way too early to say that this is a successful strategy.”

Superintendent Lewis Ferebee said that while some innovation schools are “bright spots” whose success may hold lessons for the district, it is too early to draw conclusions from ISTEP results.

Two of those bright spots are School 93 and School 103, where passing rates rose by more than 8 percentage points. The campuses are run by the Phalen Leadership Academies charter network, which joined with the team behind the Project Restore turnaround model last year.

Network leader Earl Phalen attributed the rising scores, in part, to the staffing flexibility at innovation schools. Because teachers are not part of the Indianapolis Education Association union, managers can easily replace teachers. They can also offer financial rewards for teachers who are doing a great job, he said.

The network has also had the flexibility to develop its own curriculum, technology, weekly assessments and other practices, he said.

“Those pieces I think all kind of help drive outcomes for our scholars,” Phalen said.

Skeptics and supporters of innovation schools alike emphasized that they don’t consider the test a reliable measure of school quality because of changes in the test and glitches with scoring and administration and because it doesn’t capture information on school culture.

Dountonia Batts, spokeswoman for the IPS Community Coalition, raised the possibility that passing rates might be improving because innovation schools are attracting higher scoring students or pushing out lowering scoring children.

The Coalition, which includes parents and advocates, has been skeptical of the current IPS administration and the embrace of innovation schools.

“ISTEP has gone through a lot of changes in the last couple of years,” Batts said. “Test scores leave out a lot of information about the schools and students.”

ASD scores

In Tennessee’s turnaround district, 9 in 10 young students fall short on their first TNReady exams

PHOTO: Scott Elliott

Nine out of 10 of elementary- and middle-school students in Tennessee’s turnaround district aren’t scoring on grade level in English and math, according to test score data released Thursday.

The news is unsurprising: The Achievement School District oversees 32 of the state’s lowest-performing schools. But it offers yet another piece of evidence that the turnaround initiative has fallen far short of its ambitious original goal of vaulting struggling schools to success.

Around 5,300 students in grades 3-8 in ASD schools took the new, harder state exam, TNReady, last spring. Here’s how many scored “below” or “approaching,” meaning they did not meet the state’s standards:

  • 91.8 percent of students in English language arts;
  • 91.5 percent in math;
  • 77.9 percent in science.

View scores for all ASD schools in our spreadsheet

In all cases, ASD schools’ scores fell short of state averages, which were all lower than in the past because of the new exam’s higher standards. About 66 percent of students statewide weren’t on grade level in English language arts, 62 percent weren’t on grade level in math, and 41 percent fell short in science.

ASD schools also performed slightly worse, on average, than the 15 elementary and middle schools in Shelby County Schools’ Innovation Zone, the district’s own initiative for low-performing schools. On average, about 89 percent of iZone students in 3-8 weren’t on grade level in English; 84 percent fell short of the state’s standards in math.

The last time that elementary and middle schools across the state received test scores, in 2015, ASD schools posted scores showing faster-than-average improvement. (Last year’s tests for grades 3-8 were canceled because of technical problems.)

The low scores released today suggest that the ASD’s successes with TCAP, the 2015 exam, did not carry over to the higher standards of TNReady.

But Verna Ruffin, the district’s new chief of academics, said the scores set a new bar for future growth and warned against comparing them to previous results.

“TNReady has more challenging questions and is based on a different, more rigorous set of expectations developed by Tennessee educators,” Ruffin said in a statement. “For the Achievement School District, this means that we will use this new baseline data to inform instructional practices and strategically meet the needs of our students and staff as we acknowledge the areas of strength and those areas for improvement.”

Some ASD schools broke the mold and posted some strong results. Humes Preparatory Middle School, for example, had nearly half of students meet or exceed the state’s standards in science, although only 7 percent of students in math and 12 percent in reading were on grade level.

Thursday’s score release also included individual high school level scores. View scores for individual schools throughout the state as part of our spreadsheet here.

Are Children Learning

School-by-school TNReady scores for 2017 are out now. See how your school performed

PHOTO: Zondra Williams/Shelby County Schools
Students at Wells Station Elementary School in Memphis hold a pep rally before the launch of state tests, which took place between April 17 and May 5 across Tennessee.

Nearly six months after Tennessee students sat down for their end-of-year exams, all of the scores are now out. State officials released the final installment Thursday, offering up detailed information about scores for each school in the state.

Only about a third of students met the state’s English standards, and performance in math was not much better, according to scores released in August.

The new data illuminates how each school fared in the ongoing shift to higher standards. Statewide, scores for students in grades 3-8, the first since last year’s TNReady exam was canceled amid technical difficulties, were lower than in the past. Scores also remained low in the second year of high school tests.

“These results show us both where we can learn from schools that are excelling and where we have specific schools or student groups that need better support to help them achieve success – so they graduate from high school with the ability to choose their path in life,” Education Commissioner Candice McQueen said in a statement.

Did some schools prepare teachers and students better for the new state standards, which are similar to the Common Core? Was Memphis’s score drop distributed evenly across the city’s schools? We’ll be looking at the data today to try to answer those questions.

Check out all of the scores in our spreadsheet or on the state website and add your questions and insights in the comments.