A proposed overhaul of Colorado’s public schools has hit a legislative roadblock.
State Senate leadership has assigned a bill that would create a series of legislative committees to study and propose changes to Colorado’s education laws to the State, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee.
That legislative panel is known for killing bills leadership opposes.
Sponsors of the House Bill 1287, which cleared the state House of Representatives earlier this month with broad bipartisan support, argue Colorado’s education policies are a patchwork of reform efforts and outdated mandates. And given the state’s decentralized education system, the legislature needs to play a larger role in creating a clearer vision for what Colorado schools should look like in the 21st Century.
But Senate Majority Leader Chris Holbert, a Parker Republican, said he believes the bill is just setting up an argument to send more money to schools.
“It seems like their focus is proving a premise that more money is necessary,” Holbert said Monday. “And that’s just not a premise I’m comfortable in supporting.”
State Rep. Bob Rankin, a Carbondale Republican, called Holbert’s objection shortsighted.
“It’s a dangerous viewpoint,” Rankin said. ”That’s not what this is.”
Rankin and his House co-sponsor Rep. Millie Hamner, a Dillon Democrat, both serve on the legislative committee that writes the state’s budget. For years they’ve advocated for making changes to how the state funds schools.
One of the stated goals of the bill, Hamner and Rankin have said, is to create a unified vision for the state’s schools that could be sold to voters if it was determined a tax increase would be necessary.
Between the two, Rankin has been less bullish on the argument that schools need more money.
But the bill would also provide the state a chance to review and reconsider major education legislation that’s been enacted since 2008. That includes everything from new graduation requirements for high school students to teacher evaluations.
The state affairs committee is expected to hold a hearing on the bill Wednesday.
One of the members of the committee, state Sen. Owen Hill, a Colorado Springs Republican, was a sponsor of the bill. But he dropped his support earlier this month.
He said he objected to the new bureaucratic structure the bill creates.
“A permanent new government program is not the right direction now,” he said, referring to the committees established in the bill.
Rankin, who called the bill one of the most important of his legislative career, said he’s holding out hope and would continue the conversation regardless.
“We don’t think strategically. It’s hard for most of the folks in the legislature to think way ahead,” Rankin said. “I realize it’s a heavy lift, and even if the bill does fail, we have to keep talking about it.”